What I can't understand is why anyone would want a wedding photographer who was morally opposed to their wedding. And if you could get the state to force them into accommodating you, wouldn't we need legislation to prevent them from giving everyone red-eye and maliciously cropping at the forehead? Call it the Gay Forehead Protection Act.
I like Jonah Goldberg's take on the situation. And I think Gay Patriot has found the origin of the outrage:
Isn’t it interesting how the ginned-up outrage over Indiana’s Religious Freedom Law has completely driven coverage of Hillary’s email scandal and Obama’s “Neville Chamberlain Goes to Teheran” Act out of the news?