Hillary wants to improve the lives of the 99%. Sure she does.
And to do this she'll have to topple the 1%. But wait, aren't the Clintons part of the 1%? Well, yes, but they're not capitalist exploiters. They didn't get their money through providing goods, or jobs, or paying taxes. (like those filthy capitalists) No, selling out the country isn't the same as selling goods or services.
From the NYT, for goodness sake:
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
At the time, both Rosatom and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of the company’s assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show....
2 comments:
It only takes $34,000/yr to be in the top 1% globally ... so when she says she's going to topple the 1%, that includes welfare moms here in the US.
Bill Clinton was the Wal Mart POTUS, everything on sale and no class.
Hillary is more of the same with extra contempt.
Post a Comment